🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, according to a new research carried out in Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited radical parties by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Two Decades of Media Reporting

The findings, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from a half-dozen German publications.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the far right shifted from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core subjects like assimilation and migration, established parties increasingly adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation amplified the dissemination of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Political discourse by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Across the Continent

While the research was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to affect countries across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also toughened their discourse to match that of the radical right.

In a recent interview, a then national leader advocated widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be found throughout Europe, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to France embrace the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Some political parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the radical right, despite studies indicates that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information gathered showed that the influence of far-right parties had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a co-author. "But if you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the need for established political parties to carve out their distinct narratives, especially on topics such as migration and integration, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."